- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 23:29:20 +0100
- To: "Doug Schepers" <doug.schepers@vectoreal.com>, "Web API WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 23:25:34 +0100, Doug Schepers <doug.schepers@vectoreal.com> wrote: > I agree that most of the useful arguments have been made. Stripping > away the arguments themselves, there are only 3 stances: > > 1) Shorter names are preferred; > 2) More descriptive names are preferred; > 3) Names matching existing conventions are preferred. > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems that #1 is the odd one out. I > don't care what the final name is, but it should match the latter 2 > principals. One of the arguments that was made was also that the existing methods have failed, which would make #3 the odd one out and probably #2 as well. "I don't really care what the final name, but it should match the first principle..." -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 20 December 2006 22:29:41 UTC