Re: Planning to close Web Thing Protocol Community Group due to inactivity unless we hear from you

Hi Ben,

Thank you for the updates; we won’t close the group and wish you all the best in the group’s activities.

Ian

> On Nov 20, 2023, at 6:29 AM, Ben Francis <ben@krellian.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear W3C Staff,
> 
> In the 30 days since your message the Web Thing Protocol Community Group has seen the following activity:
>     • 
> Added the final touches to our Use Cases & Requirements report
>         • https://github.com/w3c/web-thing-protocol/pull/19
>         • https://github.com/w3c/web-thing-protocol/pull/21
>         • https://github.com/w3c/web-thing-protocol/pull/22
>     • Proposed a resolution to publish our Use Cases & Requirements report, which received support from multiple members including representatives from Siemens and Intel
>         • https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-thing-protocol/2023Oct/0001.html
>         • https://github.com/w3c/web-thing-protocol/issues/20
>     • Published the report
>         • https://github.com/w3c/cg-reports/pull/32
>         • https://www.w3.org/community/reports/web-thing-protocol/CG-FINAL-web-thing-protocol-requirements-20231101
>         • https://www.w3.org/community/web-thing-protocol/2023/11/01/announcing-web-thing-protocol-use-cases-requirements/
>     • Shared a 37 page strawman proposal for the first of our core deliverables yesterday, which has now started to receive community feedback
>         • https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KWv-aQfMgsqBFg0v4rVqzcVvzzisC7y4X4CMUYGc8rE/edit#heading=h.71drcnjjomtn
>         • https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-thing-protocol/2023Nov/0002.html
>             • https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-thing-protocol/2023Nov/0003.html
>         • https://github.com/w3c/web-thing-protocol/issues/23
> I trust that this is sufficient to demonstrate that the group is active and prevent you from closing the group?
> 
> Many thanks
> 
> Ben
> 
> --
> Ben Francis
> Chair
> Web Thing Protocol Community Group
> 
> On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 at 21:02, Team Community Process <team-community-process@w3.org> wrote:
> Dear participants in the
> 
>   Web Thing Protocol Community Group
>   https://www.w3.org/community/web-thing-protocol/
> 
> In March 2023 we contacted you because your Community Group appeared to have become inactive (per [1]). Based on feedback in response to our message, we did not close the group, with the expectation that the group would soon become more active. Six months later, your group appears to still be inactive, and we are more inclined to close it unless we hear compelling reasons not to.
> 
> If your group is in fact active, we recommend the following:
> 
>   * Let us know where the activity is going on so that we can update our data and improve our tools.
> 
>   * Update your group home page with news of your activities. Chairs can use the group Wordpress instance of the group to post news; let us know if you have any questions.
> 
> If you have good reason to believe the group will soon become active, please let us know.
> 
> If you are merely hopeful it will, or if you would like us to close the group, or if we do not hear from you in the next 30 days, we will plan to close the group.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> CG/BG System
> 
> [1] https://www.w3.org/community/about/faq/#close-inactive
> 
> 
> 

--
Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
https://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/
Tel: +1 917 450 8783

Received on Monday, 20 November 2023 17:34:37 UTC