- From: Samuel Weiler <weiler@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 11:34:13 -0400
- To: "public-privacy (W3C mailing list)" <public-privacy@w3.org>
- Cc: "public-web-security@w3.org" <public-web-security@w3.org>
FYI, the W3C Process Community Group (CG) is discussing Process changes around horizontal review (HR), including: -- automatic triggering events, like publishing a FPWD, and -- making (asking for) review mandatory. While this has some obvious charms, I have some concerns. -- Automatic triggers won't indicate if a group has done the prerequisite work HR groups expect of them (in our case, going though the Questionnaire and fingerprinting guidance docs and writing Privacy and Security considerations sections in their docs). -- They're nailing down too much in Process, which may make it harder for us to introduce improvements. If you're interested, the Process CG discussion can be found in: https://github.com/w3c/w3process/issues/130 https://github.com/w3c/w3process/pull/401 Additionally, the guidance we're publishing for how to ask for reviews is at: https://www.w3.org/wiki/DocumentReview#How_to_get_horizontal_review -- Sam [This note is being CC'ed to the Web Security IG. While the WebSec IG is closed, its list is still active, and WGs are directed to request reviews on this list. W3C Team (me!) is coordinating getting reviews from individual volunteer reviewers. If you would like to join that pool and do the occasional doc review, drop me a note.]
Received on Wednesday, 8 July 2020 15:34:17 UTC