Re: Security HR for JSON-LD 1.1 WG specifications

Dear Security IG folks,

TPAC is upon us, and we have to move forwards with CR. Our working drafts
are now all but finalized and hence review would be appreciated.

We have completed the security review questionnaire, the results of which
are available here:
  https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-wg/issues/89

If there are any issues with those, please let us know, otherwise we
consider that the specifications are acceptable as is.

The drafts are:
  * https://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld11/
  * https://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld11-api/
  * https://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld11-framing/

If there are issues, we would greatly appreciate a discussion at TPAC if
possible.

Many thanks,

Rob Sanderson & Benjamin Young (co-chairs of JSON-LD WG)


On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 1:16 PM Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Dear Security IG folks,
>
> The JSON-LD WG hopes to move to CR about the time of TPAC or shortly
> thereafter.  Our working drafts are stabilizing but not 100% complete at
> this time.
>
> We would very much like to schedule the horizontal security review with
> you. We would anticipate including at least one chair and one editor for
> the discussion, likely myself (Rob Sanderson) and Gregg Kellogg.
>
> Our TR-track specs are:
>   * https://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld11/
>   * https://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld11-api/
>   * https://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld11-framing/
>
> Many thanks!
>
> Rob
>
> --
> Rob Sanderson
> Semantic Architect
> The Getty Trust
> Los Angeles, CA 90049
>


-- 
Rob Sanderson
Semantic Architect
The Getty Trust
Los Angeles, CA 90049