- From: Henry Story <henry.story@co-operating.systems>
- Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 12:15:28 +0100
- To: GALINDO Virginie <Virginie.GALINDO@gemalto.com>
- Cc: Dave Longley Longley <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com>, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>, Carvalho Melvin <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, Martin Paljak <martin.paljak@ria.ee>, "public-web-security@w3.org" <public-web-security@w3.org>, WebAppSec WG <public-webappsec@w3.org>
> On 25 Sep 2015, at 15:38, GALINDO Virginie <Virginie.GALINDO@gemalto.com> wrote: > > Thanks for completing your use case on the wiki dedicated to that topic, guys ! > https://www.w3.org/Security/wiki/IG/a_view_on_SOP > > Regards, > Virginie Thanks Virginie for the great idea of putting up this wiki. Mailing list discussions are very educational if one follows them with great care, but it is very difficult for people who jump in from the outside in mid conversation or who are following from the sidelines to understand what if anything has been gained by the discussion. I have brought together a lot of what I have learnt about SOP with many references to IETF and W3C specs, pointers to new evolutions in the webapp(sec) groups, and discussion with community members on the wiki https://www.w3.org/Security/wiki/IG/a_view_on_SOP This weekend I re-arranged the wiki into three pieces 1. Conceptual map : just to give an idea how work from privacy, identity, security, logic, and other areas bear on the issue. There are still pieces to be filled out here. 2. Exceptions to SOP: the more I look around the more I have found well documented and justified exceptions to narrow understandings of SOP. This should give us some good raw material for a later exploration of a theory of SOP. 3. Implications for Future standards. A third section on who SOP is bringing up issues for future requirements such as WebPayments. 4. Theory of SOP Here I think we'll be able to bring together an extended theory of SOP that makes sense of the exceptions, whilst showing how these tie into other elements of the conceptual spaces. My feeling is that a bit of work in some very initial modal logic of belief contexts would help give a secure logical foundation. I think this is taking shape. Of course there will be errors, improvements. It is not complete, so feedback is welcome. Henry
Received on Monday, 28 September 2015 11:16:05 UTC