- From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 00:31:44 +0000
- To: Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com>
- Cc: GALINDO Virginie <Virginie.Galindo@gemalto.com>, "public-webcrypto@w3.org" <public-webcrypto@w3.org>, "public-web-security@w3.org" <public-web-security@w3.org>, Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org>, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAL02cgTVaji+em0rLsXK7o=rDP442c1iqpHYTwbuXdxokbeFKw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 7:43 PM, Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com> wrote: > As noted during the F2F during the 2014 TPAC, it's unlikely we would > be able to support such a rechartering. > > In the goals, only the first goal is something that aligns with our > interest. > In the scope, we are explicitly not interested in "user managed" > storage and "web certificate management". Further, we don't believe > this group is the appropriate venue for the discussion of Web > Authentication - that would be better for WebApps or WebAppSec. > WebAppSec already has proposals for dealing with credentials - > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2014JulSep/0141.html > > Put differently, for a rechartering, the only effort we'd likely > support support is the maintenance and exploration of algorithms. > > Any other chartering discussions should follow the highly productive > workmodes of WebApps and WebAppSecs - that is, concrete, defined > proposals being brought forth and holding rechartering discussions in > specific and narrow scopes if such proposals have consensus (in > particular, from user agents). > Reserving the right to disagree with Ryan on the particular scoping above, I strongly agree with the above paragraph. None of the proposed work items to date has been defined in enough scope to make it clear what a WG would do. --Richard > > > On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 1:48 AM, GALINDO Virginie > <Virginie.Galindo@gemalto.com> wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > > > > > Web Crypto WG charter [1] will end by the end of March. We need to > prepare > > the next charter of Web Crypto. > > > > > > > > As a reminder, the conversation has started on this page : > > https://www.w3.org/Security/wiki/IG/webcryptonext_draft_charter > > > > Feel free to add you ideas and suggestions on the wiki and/or expose your > > opinion and question on the public-webcrypto@w3.org or > > public-webcrypto-comment@w3.org (for non W3C Web Crypto WG members). > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Virginie > > > > > > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/11/webcryptography-charter.html > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > This message and any attachments are intended solely for the addressees > and > > may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized use or disclosure, > > either whole or partial, is prohibited. > > E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable > for > > the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended > > recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender. > > Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this transmission > > free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for damages caused by a > > transmitted virus. > >
Received on Thursday, 8 January 2015 00:32:12 UTC