- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 12:42:31 -0400
- To: public-web-security@w3.org
On 5/28/14 11:57 AM, GALINDO Virginie wrote: > > Dear all, > > As we received our first requests for conducting security review on > Web RTC and Manifest specifications, I think it is time for this IG to > confirm that the tools proposed on our wiki are relevant to start > security review. This is why I am calling for comments on : > > -Security Review Process [1] : allowing the other groups to request > security review and setting up a frame for the review and reviewer > > -Security Guidelines [2] : supporting editors and chairs to fill in > the Security Consideration section in their deliverable > > Lets give us **15 days** to collect comments on this mailing list ( I > will edit those tools accordingly on the wiki). > > After that first period, those tools will be our basis for beta > testing our security reviews. > > Hope to see your active contributions here. > Hi Virginie, All, Has the group agreed to "track" reviews to facilitate Qs like "so, what is now being reviewed; when does the review for doc X end; who agreed to review doc X; where are the comments from the review of doc X; what were the results of the review" and such? I see there is an empty section in [1] that could include this type of data (or it might make sense to create a new page). Is the expectation the reviews will be done on this list? The TAG uses GH for its reviews [GH]. It also seems something like [specifiction] could be used. How does PING conduct its spec reviews and track them (as it might make sense to use similar/identical methods)? -Thanks, AB [GH] <https://github.com/w3ctag/spec-reviews> [specifiction] <http://discourse.specifiction.org/> > Regards, > > Virginie > > Gemalto > > Co-chair of Web Security IG > > [1] Security Review process > http://www.w3.org/Security/wiki/IG/W3C_spec_review > <http://www.w3.org/Security/wiki/IG/W3C_spec_review> > > [2] Security Guidelines > https://www.w3.org/Security/wiki/IG/W3C_spec_review/Security_Guidelines > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This message and any attachments are intended solely for the > addressees and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized > use or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited. > E-mails are susceptible to alteration. Our company shall not be liable > for the message if altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the > intended recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the > sender. > Although all reasonable efforts have been made to keep this > transmission free from viruses, the sender will not be liable for > damages caused by a transmitted virus.
Received on Wednesday, 28 May 2014 16:43:01 UTC