- From: David Dahl <ddahl@mozilla.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 09:24:12 -0700 (PDT)
- To: Brad Hill <bhill@paypal-inc.com>
- Cc: public-web-security@w3.org
I have taken this HMAC api and added it to the spec: interface CryptoHmac { attribute DOMString algorithm; void createHMAC(DOMString plainText, DOMString pubKey, createHMACCallback callback); void verifyHMAC(DOMString plainText, verifyHMACCallback callback); }; WebIDL is in progress here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=537428&action=edit Cheers, David ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brad Hill" <bhill@paypal-inc.com> To: "David Dahl" <ddahl@mozilla.com>, public-web-security@w3.org Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2011 4:00:50 PM Subject: RE: Request for feedback: DOMCrypt API proposal You've included a SHA-256 hash function, but not an HMAC-SHA-256 function. Having looked at many, many webapps as a pentester, I can assure that 99% of folks will do message authentication insecurely without better API support than a raw hash function. They will: (a) create insecure constructions using secret prefix or secret suffix concatenations instead of implementing real HMAC, and then (b) they will leak timing information during verification I would propose the following APIs: (if you only support SHA256 and have no plans to implement other algorithms) hmac: { createHMAC: function (plaintext, key, function callback(mac){ }) { } verifyHMAC: function(plaintext, key, receivedMac, function callback(booleanVerified){ }){ } } Where verifyHMAC implements double-HMAC verification to prevent timing leakage as described here: http://www.isecpartners.com/blog/2011/2/18/double-hmac-verification.html Adding algorithm setters as is done for the symmetric functions would allow agility to move to, e.g. SHA3 in the future when it is defined. -Brad Hill -----Original Message----- From: public-web-security-request@w3.org [mailto:public-web-security-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Dahl Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 6:46 AM To: public-web-security@w3.org Subject: Request for feedback: DOMCrypt API proposal Hello public-web-security members, (I wanted to post this proposed draft spec for the DOMCrypt API ( https://wiki.mozilla.org/Privacy/Features/DOMCryptAPISpec/Latest ) to this list - if there is a more fitting mailing list, please let me know) I recently posted this draft spec for a crypto API for browsers to the whatwg (see: http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2011-May/031741.html) and wanted to get feedback from W3C as well. Privacy and user control on the web is of utter importance. Tracking, unauthorized user data aggregation and personal information breaches are becoming so commonplace you see a new headline almost daily. (It seems). We need crypto APIs in browsers to allow developers to create more secure communications tools and web applications that don’t have to implicitly trust the server, among other use cases. The DOMCrypt API is a good start, and more feedback and discussion will really help round out how all of this should work – as well as how it can work in any browser that will support such an API. This API will provide each web browser window with a ‘cipher’ property[1] that facilitates: asymmetric encryption key pair generation public key encryption public key decryption symmetric encryption signature generation signature verification hashing easy public key discovery via meta tags or an ‘addressbookentry’ tag [1] There is a bit of discussion around adding this API to window.navigator or consolidation within window.crypto I have created a Firefox extension that implements most of the above, and am working on an experimental patch that integrates this API into Firefox. The project originated in an extension I wrote, the home page is here: http://domcrypt.org The source code for the extension is here: https://github.com/daviddahl/domcrypt The Mozilla bugs are here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=649154 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=657432 Firefox "feature wiki page": https://wiki.mozilla.org/Privacy/Features/DOMCryptAPI You can test the API by installing the extension hosted at domcrypt.org, and going to http://domcrypt.org A recent blog post updating all of this is posted here: http://monocleglobe..wordpress.com/2011/06/01/domcrypt-update-2011-06-01/ The API: window.cipher = { // Public Key API pk: { set algorithm(algorithm){ }, get algorithm(){ }, // Generate a keypair and then execute the callback function generateKeypair: function ( function callback( aPublicKey ) { } ) { }, // encrypt a plainText encrypt: function ( plainText, function callback (cipherMessageObject) ) { } ) { }, // decrypt a cipherMessage decrypt: function ( cipherMessageObject, function callback ( plainText ) { } ) { }, // sign a message sign: function ( plainText, function callback ( signature ) { } ) { }, // verify a signature verify: function ( signature, plainText, function callback ( boolean ) { } ) { }, // get the JSON cipherAddressbook get addressbook() {}, // make changes to the addressbook saveAddressbook: function (JSONObject, function callback ( addresssbook ) { }) { } }, // Symmetric Crypto API sym: { get algorithm(), set algorithm(algorithm), // create a new symmetric key generateKey: function (function callback ( key ){ }) { }, // encrypt some data encrypt: function (plainText, key, function callback( cipherText ){ }) { }, // decrypt some data decrypt: function (cipherText, key, function callback( plainText ) { }) { }, }, // hashing hash: { SHA256: function (function callback (hash){}) { } } } Your feedback and criticism will be invaluable. Best regards, David Dahl Firefox Engineer, Mozilla Corp.
Received on Monday, 6 June 2011 16:24:41 UTC