Re: [Content Security Policy] Proposal to move the debate forward

On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Daniel Veditz <dveditz@mozilla.com> wrote:
> Think of "allow" as "default-src": it provides the value for any
> missing directive. Your policy has an explicit img-src and
> script-src so those are what will be used for those types (and you
> did not specify 'self' for those so you won't be able to load
> scripts from your own site). Any other type of content (stylesheets,
> plugins, etc) will be limited to 'self'.

Perhaps "allow" should be renamed to "default-src"?  It seems
significantly more intuitive.

Received on Sunday, 30 January 2011 20:22:40 UTC