- From: <sird@rckc.at>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 17:19:56 -0600
- To: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
- Cc: public-web-security@w3.org, Sid Stamm <sid@mozilla.com>, Brandon Sterne <bsterne@mozilla.com>
Hi Adam! I did a script that does this a few years ago: http://secinn.appspot.com/pstzine/read?issue=4&articleid=8 Mod Security is using it now as a demo, and there are a few sessions about it in OWASP Summit in Portugal next month. Greetings!! -- Eduardo On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, sird@rckc.at <sird@rckc.at> wrote: >> Couldn't the same be done with simply a script element? No need for >> webkit (browser) support. > > I believe you can block external script loads using the beforeload > event, but I don't know how you would be able to block inline scripts > or inline event handlers purely in script. Another approach, of > course, is to add "before" events for these operations as well to > allow for programatic control. > > Adam > > >> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com> wrote: >>> Hi public-web-security, >>> >>> I'm not sure if this the right forum for discussing new browser >>> features that help mitigate cross-site scripting. If not, please feel >>> free to point me to a better forum. >>> >>> As I'm sure many of you are aware, various folks from Mozilla have >>> proposed Content Security Policies >>> <https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/CSP> as a way of improving the >>> security of web pages by including a security policy. I'm interested >>> two aspects of CSP: >>> >>> 1) Cross-site scripting mitigation >>> 2) Notification of policy violations >>> >>> The simplest design I could think of that achieves those goals is >>> described on this wiki page: >>> >>> https://trac.webkit.org/wiki/HTML%20Security%20Policy >>> >>> The design is largely inspired by CSP, but different in a few ways: >>> >>> 1) Instead of using HTTP headers, the policy is expressed in HTML. Of >>> course, authors will want to place the policy as early as possible in >>> their document, so we're using a meta element, which can be placed in >>> the head of the document. >>> >>> 2) Instead of exposing policy levers for every kind of resource load, >>> this proposal only lets the author control the source scripts. This >>> focus on scripts is motivated by wanting to prevent the attacker from >>> injecting script into the page. >>> >>> 3) Instead of reporting violations to the server via HTTP, this >>> proposal simply generates a DOM event in the document. The author of >>> the page can listen for the event and wire it up to whatever analytics >>> the author uses for other kinds of events (e.g., mouse clicks). >>> >>> Let me know if you have any feedback on this proposal. In general, >>> I'm more interested in feedback that leads to simplification rather >>> than feedback that leads to more complexity. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> Adam >>> >>> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 19 January 2011 23:20:44 UTC