- From: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 21:18:26 -0800
- To: Brandon Sterne <bsterne@mozilla.com>
- Cc: Daniel Veditz <dveditz@mozilla.com>, "sird@rckc.at" <sird@rckc.at>, public-web-security@w3.org
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Brandon Sterne <bsterne@mozilla.com> wrote: > I see your comments suggesting this change and Collin's supporting them. > I don't see how you got from there to "this group". I'm not saying the > suggested change is without merit, but there is a case to be made > against it which Dan brought up. I think the debate is still open. Fair enough. Perhaps we should continue the discussion in the other thread. Adam > On 02/22/2011 07:41 PM, Adam Barth wrote: >> Oh, I meant this group. >> >> Adam >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Daniel Veditz <dveditz@mozilla.com> wrote: >>> I haven't seen any consensus forming on that, maybe Adam's "we" >>> means webkit. >>> >>> On 2/22/11 1:31 AM, sird@rckc.at wrote: >>>> Oh, I wasn't aware that the "default-do-noting" was really happening. >>>> >>>> -- Eduardo >>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 1:16 AM, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com> wrote: >>>>> I don't think the situation is as tricky as you make it out to be, >>>>> especially if we go the route of an empty CSP policy not implying >>>>> inline script restrictions, which seems likely. >>>>> >>>>> Adam >
Received on Thursday, 24 February 2011 05:27:35 UTC