- From: Brandon Sterne <bsterne@mozilla.com>
- Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 08:25:20 -0700
- To: art.barstow@nokia.com
- CC: ext Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Arun Ranganathan <arun@mozilla.com>, ext Daniel Veditz <dveditz@mozilla.com>, "public-web-security@w3.org" <public-web-security@w3.org>
I think W3C is the right venue for CSP given that CSP is primarily geared towards content restrictions and HASMAT will be primarily focused on transport-level restrictions (think Origin header, STS, etc.). I think there is a neat separation between these two areas which maps well to the areas of focus of IETF and W3C. -Brandon On 06/03/2010 11:39 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > Would this be a reasonable/acceptable place for CSP? > > -Art Barstow > > P.S. "hasmat" - that's a good one! >>> From: Peter Saint-Andre<stpeter@stpeter.im> >>> Date: 3 June 2010 20:14:13 GMT+02:00 >>> To: "apps-discuss@ietf.org"<apps-discuss@ietf.org> >>> Subject: Re: HTTP Application Security (HAS) BoF >>> >>> We now have a dedicated list for this BoF: >>> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hasmat >>> >>> Please discuss further on that list. I'll be blasting various lists and >>> individuals regarding the BoF. >>> >>> On 6/2/10 8:11 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >>> >>>> I've received a proposal to hold a birds of a feather (BoF) session at >>>> IETF 78 in Maastricht on the topic of HTTP Application Security. A >>>> draft charter and agenda can be found below. Please discuss on the >>>> apps-discuss@ietf.org list:
Received on Wednesday, 9 June 2010 15:26:30 UTC