- From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:02:02 +0100
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org, public-web-security@w3.org
Julian Reschke wrote: > For symmetry, we should also have > > application/xhtml-sandboxed+xml > > right? If we want sandboxed XHTML, then it might be better to make it application/xml-sandboxed, so that it can clearly be used for any XML content. Otherwise, it seems like it would be a huge pain it that were to lead down the path of adding application/svg-sandboxed+xml and other application/*-standboxed+xml types for all many different types of XML documents. Adding one new MIME type is painful enough already for the legacy compatibility problems it creates, the need to modify Accept headers sent by browsers in requests, to update servers to support the new types, etc. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/
Received on Friday, 15 January 2010 16:02:59 UTC