- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:33:14 -0800
- To: gaz Heyes <gazheyes@gmail.com>
- Cc: Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>, public-web-security@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 9 December 2009 17:33:55 UTC
On Dec 9, 2009, at 8:46 AM, gaz Heyes wrote: > 2009/12/9 Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com> > In particular, I would suggest that nothing ever be added to CSS that > triggers access to remote resources but doesn't use url(), and is > allowed in inline styles or doesn't have to be at the top of the > stylesheet. As far as I know, there are currently no such constructs > that exist or are planned, so blacklisting the (a)-(c) that I gave > should be safe. Is this correct? If so, does it sound like it's > feasible to keep it safe? > > Namespaces allow remote resources without url() > <http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-namespace/> I don't see how? The use of URLs there is solely for purposes of defining XML namespaces, the URLs are never deferenced. Regards, Maciej
Received on Wednesday, 9 December 2009 17:33:55 UTC