- From: Richard M. Smith <rms@computerbytesman.com>
- Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 14:00:33 -0400
- To: "W3C Public Web Plugins List" <public-web-plugins@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <E1CEAfX-0008EO-MA@frink.w3.org>
http://www.rochesterdandc.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20041002/BUSINESS/4 10020333 <http://www.rochesterdandc.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20041002/BUSINESS/ 410020333&SearchID=73185676035359> &SearchID=73185676035359 Kodak wins Java lawsuit It returns to court next week to seek $1.06 billion in damages from Sun What's at stake Kodak will be asking a federal jury to award more than $1 billion in damages in connection with a patent lawsuit. Analysts say the money could help provide a financial cushion as Kodak shifts from chemical to computerized imaging. Ben <mailto:brand@democratandchronicle.com> Rand Staff writer (October 2, 2004) - Eastman Kodak Co. will return to U.S. District Court next week to seek $1 billion in damages from Sun Microsystems Inc. now that a federal jury has ruled in its favor in a dispute over the Java computer language. The jury decided in Rochester on Friday that Sun infringed on technology belonging to Kodak when it developed and introduced Java more than a decade ago. The computer language is now used heavily by software developers, on the Internet and in computer schools. Kodak praised the verdict and said it was part of an aggressive push to convert innovations - both homegrown and purchased - into real money. The company over the past several years has been issuing licenses, filing lawsuits, forming spinoff companies and finding other uses for its technologies. "Kodak has and continues to make substantial technology investments to ensure high-quality products," said Kodak. "We are pleased that the court has validated Kodak's intellectual property rights protecting these valuable innovations." Rochester's largest employer claimed during a three-week trial that portions of Java infringed on patents Kodak purchased from Wang Laboratories Inc. in late 1997. The patents describe a method by which a program can "ask for help" from another application to carry out certain computer-oriented functions. That's generally similar to the way Java operates, according to Kodak and other experts. Ironically, the verdict came a day after Sun introduced a new version of Java. The company and some analysts hailed it as one of the most significant upgrades since Java's introduction a decade ago. Sun denied Kodak's patent infringement claims. The company argued in court that Java did not infringe on the Kodak patents, and even if it did, the patents were invalid. The Silicon Valley giant on Friday said it would "put on a vigorous defense" in the next phase of the trial, in which the jury will hear testimony to help it determine how much Kodak should be paid. That phase begins sometime next week. Kodak in pre-trial documents indicated it would ask for $1.06 billion in lump-sum royalties - a figure that represents half of Sun's operating profit from the sales of computer servers and storage equipment between January 1998 and June 2001. The argument: Java provides the engine for such computer equipment. Sun executives have publicly estimated that Java is a "key factor in 90 percent of Sun's sales," Kodak said. The damages phase will likely be sharply litigated, according to a local patent lawyer. "Kodak will (probably) be urging for a broad royalty base and a reasonable royalty, and I'm sure Sun will argue that the use was small and the royalty base should be lower," said Thomas Fitzgerald, a patent lawyer for the past three decades. He noted that the case is "a big deal" because patents covering software are a relatively recent phenomenon. "In general, software patents are just coming into vogue," Fitzgerald said. He said an appeal was likely. The potential of a sizable verdict doesn't change Kodak's strategic challenges, a local investment professional said. Kodak must continue making progress on its plan to offset declining film sales with new businesses built around digital imaging. "The money doesn't make you a better company," said Christopher Hayes, chief investment officer of Hayes-Fischer Capital Management Co. in Rochester. "You just hope that it doesn't make them think, 'OK, we can take a rest.' They still have their work cut out for them." Still, Hayes said, the verdict helps extend an upbeat period for the company. Kodak has boosted profits in each of the last three quarters, is moving faster than expected in integrating acquired companies and has seen its stock price surge about 60 percent in the last 12 months. "It's finally nice to see the ball rolling after everyone went through a sea of negatives," Hayes said. brand@democratandchronicle.com
Received on Sunday, 3 October 2004 18:01:11 UTC