- From: <TheoDP@aol.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 15:37:17 -0400
- To: public-web-plugins@w3.org
--> From http://www.eweek.com/print_article/0,1761,a=133765,00.asp According to patent office spokeswoman Brigid Quinn, Eolas on Monday was mailed an "office action" on the re-examination of the disputed patent. A number of online reports said the patent office examiner decided to reject the 10 claims presented by Eolas. But Eolas attorney Martin Lueck, of Minneapolis-based Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi LLP, said the examiner had accepted a number of Eolas' arguments and had withdrawn his previous finding from February. Lueck said the patent office examiner had issued a new action based on yet another piece of "prior art" to reject the patent's claims. The prior-art piece was outside the examples offered by the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium), which brought the prior-art question to the attention of the patent office in November 2003. Prior art is a legal term referring to whether an invention existed prior to the filing of a patent. But this "piece of art" was not addressed in the February action, he said, hence the reversal. "We're back to square one," Lueck said.
Received on Friday, 20 August 2004 19:37:52 UTC