public-web-plugins@w3.org from September 2003 by date

Wednesday, 1 October 2003

• Re: What a prior art product must do Jason Cunliffe
• RE: What a prior art product must do jim@idexer.com
• RE: What a prior art product must do Richard M. Smith

Tuesday, 30 September 2003

• Re: What a prior art product must do Jason Cunliffe

Wednesday, 1 October 2003

• Clearification of my Sept 25 Post jim@idexer.com

Tuesday, 30 September 2003

• Re: What a prior art product must do jim@idexer.com
• RE: What a prior art product must do Benjamin Franz
• RE: What a prior art product must do Glenn Randers-Pehrson
• RE: What a prior art product must do Richard M. Smith
• Re: What a prior art product must do Glenn Randers-Pehrson

Sunday, 28 September 2003

• Re: The HTML Patent Advisory Group formed Philipp Hoschka

Thursday, 25 September 2003

• A federal judge has dismissed a patent infringement case against Microsoft Richard M. Smith
• RE: The HTML Patent Advisory Group formed Wiswell, Virginia
• Re: The HTML Patent Advisory Group formed Philipp Hoschka
• The HTML Patent Advisory Group formed Jerry Mead
• Two new CNET articles on the Eolas '906 patent Richard M. Smith
• Modern Browsers May NOT Infringe Eola After All jim@idexer.com

Monday, 22 September 2003

• Re: Eolas suit may spark HTML changes Karl Dubost

Saturday, 20 September 2003

• More plugin patent woes Richard M. Smith
• Plugin + embedded object Andrew Arme
• Eolas says it would settle over IE Richard M. Smith
• Eolas says it would settle over IE Mike Leach (Cubic Compass)
• Eolas suit may spark HTML changes Richard M. Smith

Thursday, 18 September 2003

• RE: Server Workaround to Render "Second" Documents Acceptable? Neil Munro
• RE: Server Workaround to Render "Second" Documents Acceptable? Mike
• RE: Server Workaround to Render "Second" Documents Acceptable? Sturm, Thomas
• Prior art via scripts? Andrew Arme
• RE: Server Workaround to Render "Second" Documents Acceptable? christopher.jauregui@syngenta.com

Wednesday, 17 September 2003

• RE: Server Workaround to Render "Second" Documents Acceptable? Sturm, Thomas
• RE: Server Workaround to Render "Second" Documents Acceptable? Scott Cadillac
• Server Workaround to Render "Second" Documents Acceptable? Mike
• Re: Setback for Microsoft Ripples Through the World Wide Web tom poe
• Setback for Microsoft Ripples Through the World Wide Web Richard M. Smith

Tuesday, 16 September 2003

• Re: Cross patent just issued to James Gosling? Hector Santos
• Cross patent just issued to James Gosling? Benjamin Franz
• Re: What would it take? Alex Rivero

Monday, 15 September 2003

• What would it take? Chris 'Xenon' Hanson
• Re: Ray Ozzie claims prior art in Lotus Notes Hector Santos
• AW: Ray Ozzie claims prior art in Lotus Notes Eike Pierstorff
• Re: Ray Ozzie claims prior art in Lotus Notes Jerry Mead
• RE: Ray Ozzie claims prior art in Lotus Notes Steve Brimley
• RE: Scope of the patent Steve Brimley
• Re: Scope of the patent Jake Robb
• Re: Ray Ozzie claims prior art in Lotus Notes Jake Robb

Sunday, 14 September 2003

• Slashdot Jerry Mead

Saturday, 13 September 2003

• Re: Ray Ozzie claims prior art in Lotus Notes Hector Santos
• RE: Ray Ozzie claims prior art in Lotus Notes Richard M. Smith
• Re: Scope of the patent Reza Roboubi
• Re: Ray Ozzie claims prior art in Lotus Notes D Goneit
• Re: Ray Ozzie claims prior art in Lotus Notes Hector Santos
• RE: Ray Ozzie claims prior art in Lotus Notes Richard M. Smith
• RE: Ray Ozzie claims prior art in Lotus Notes Richard M. Smith
• Re: Scope of the patent Alastair
• Re: Ray Ozzie claims prior art in Lotus Notes Hector Santos
• Ray Ozzie claims prior art in Lotus Notes Jerry Mead

Friday, 12 September 2003

• Scope of the patent Steve Brimley
• Re: If MS pulls plug-in support, who do I sue Hector Santos
• Re: If MS pulls plug-in support, who do I sue Jake Robb
• RE: If MS pulls plug-in support, who do I sue Richard S. Hendershot
• CHIP was Re: Proposal: Internet Archive (a potential patent work around?) Jeffrey Altman
• Re: Proposal: Internet Archive (a potential patent work around?) Jake Robb
• Re: Proposal: Internet Archive (a potential patent work around?) SerpentMage (Christian Gross)
• Re: Proposal: Internet Archive (a potential patent work around?) Jake Robb
• Proposal: Internet Archive (a potential patent work around?) SerpentMage (Christian Gross)
• Further thoughts on the Eolas patent coverage Jerry Mead
• Timeline? Sturm, Thomas

Thursday, 11 September 2003

• RE: CNN circumvents the Eolas Patent? Scott Cadillac
• RE: CNN circumvents the Eolas Patent? Richard M. Smith
• AW: CNN circumvents the Eolas Patent? Eike Pierstorff
• Re: CNN circumvents the Eolas Patent? Jerry Mead
• Re: CNN circumvents the Eolas Patent? Daniel_Austin@grainger.com
• Re: CNN circumvents the Eolas Patent? Jake Robb
• RE: CNN circumvents the Eolas Patent? Richard M. Smith
• RE: CNN circumvents the Eolas Patent? Daniel_Austin@grainger.com
• RE: CNN circumvents the Eolas Patent? Daniel_Austin@grainger.com
• RE: CNN circumvents the Eolas Patent? Khan, Mahtab
• RE: CNN circumvents the Eolas Patent? Richard M. Smith
• CNN circumvents the Eolas Patent? Jeff Stevens

Tuesday, 9 September 2003

• Re: a what if... Frans Meijer

Thursday, 4 September 2003

• Re: a what if... Frans

Thursday, 11 September 2003

• Re: Microsoft benefits a lot by loosing (?) Reza Roboubi
• Re: [Fwd: PATNEWS: Patent abstracts, Eolas workaround, filewrappe r estoppel] Thomas Chiverton
• Re: Microsoft benefits a lot by loosing (?) Thomas Chiverton

Wednesday, 10 September 2003

• RE: Microsoft benefits a lot by loosing (?) Richard M. Smith
• Re: Microsoft benefits a lot by loosing (?) Reza Roboubi
• RE: [Fwd: PATNEWS: Patent abstracts, Eolas workaround, filewrapper estoppel] Richard M. Smith
• RE: [Fwd: PATNEWS: Patent abstracts, Eolas workaround, filewrapper estoppel] Neil Munro
• Re: [Fwd: PATNEWS: Patent abstracts, Eolas workaround, filewrapper estoppel] Jeffrey Altman
• Re: [Fwd: PATNEWS: Patent abstracts, Eolas workaround, filewrapper estoppel] Benjamin Franz
• Re: Microsoft benefits a lot by loosing (?) Jake Robb
• RE: Microsoft benefits a lot by loosing (?) Richard M. Smith
• Re: Microsoft benefits a lot by loosing (?) Reza Roboubi
• [Fwd: PATNEWS: Patent abstracts, Eolas workaround, filewrapper estoppel] Jeffrey Altman
• Re: Microsoft benefits a lot by loosing (?) Nicolas Costes
• Re: Microsoft benefits a lot by loosing (?) Jake Robb
• RE: Microsoft benefits a lot by loosing (?) Richard M. Smith
• Microsoft benefits a lot by loosing (?) Reza Roboubi

Tuesday, 9 September 2003

• RE: If MS pulls plug-in support, who do I sue neo binedell
• Re: If MS pulls plug-in support, who do I sue Michael Condouris
• Re: If MS pulls plug-in support, who do I sue Jake Robb
• Re: If MS pulls plug-in support, who do I sue Hector Santos
• Re: If MS pulls plug-in support, who do I sue Jake Robb
• RE: If MS pulls plug-in support, who do I sue Michael Condouris
• RE: If MS pulls plug-in support, who do I sue neo binedell
• Re: If MS pulls plug-in support, who do I sue Hector Santos
• RE: If MS pulls plug-in support, who do I sue Richard M. Smith
• Re: If MS pulls plug-in support, who do I sue Jake Robb
• Re: If MS pulls plug-in support, who do I sue Hector Santos
• RE: If MS pulls plug-in support, who do I sue Richard M. Smith
• Re: If MS pulls plug-in support, who do I sue Jake Robb
• RE: If MS pulls plug-in support, who do I sue Russell Cowdrey
• Actually, the SW Patents Battle is Heating up *Right Now* (was Re: If MS pulls plug-in support, who do I sue) Seth Johnson
• Re: If MS pulls plug-in support, who do I sue Hector Santos
• Re: If MS pulls plug-in support, who do I sue Hector Santos

Monday, 8 September 2003

• RE: If MS pulls plug-in support, who do I sue Richard M. Smith
• If MS pulls plug-in support, who do I sue Russell Cowdrey
• Re: a what if... Nicolas Costes
• Re: Will this verdict effect java? Benjamin Franz
• Will this verdict effect java? Driekus de Lange
• RE: Here's some libellous drivel for you (no holds barred) Neil Munro
• Re: Here's some libellous drivel for you (no holds barred) Hector Santos
• Here's some libellous drivel for you (no holds barred) Kade.Hansson@dpiwe.tas.gov.au

Saturday, 6 September 2003

• Re: Separate programs Reza Roboubi
• Separate programs Neil Munro

Friday, 5 September 2003

• Patent family of US0005838906A - regional aspects Axel H Horns

Saturday, 6 September 2003

• Business Model vs. Software Patent Reza Roboubi
• Which patent sub-sections can stand alone? Reza Roboubi
• Re: What a prior art product must do Reza Roboubi

Wednesday, 3 September 2003

• Re: What a prior art product must do Scott Ahten

Friday, 5 September 2003

• Re: Surprised Jerry Mead
• RE: Surprised Scott Cadillac
• Re: Surprised D Goneit
• Re: Surprised tom poe

Thursday, 4 September 2003

• Surprised D Goneit

Friday, 5 September 2003

• Re: a what if... D Goneit
• More Prior Art - BBS Systems and FrontEnds Hector Santos
• RE: a what if... Michael Condouris
• RE: a what if... Scott Cadillac
• Re: a what if... Jake Robb
• Re: a what if... Hector Santos
• Re: a what if... Jake Robb
• RE: a what if... Aral Balkan
• RE: a what if... Scott Cadillac
• Re: a what if... Michael Condouris
• Re: a what if... Jake Robb

Thursday, 4 September 2003

• RE: a what if... Aral Balkan
• Re: Judge's ruling on the early history of Eolas vs. Viola (try #2) Hector Santos
• Re: a what if... Hector Santos
• a what if... Michael Condouris
• Judge's ruling on the early history of Eolas vs. Viola (try #2) Richard M. Smith
• Judge's ruling on the early history of Eolas vs. Viola Richard M. Smith
• RE: Pei Wei's ViolaWWW project: Was it prior art? Benjamin Franz
• RE: Pei Wei's ViolaWWW project: Was it prior art? Stolowitz, Micah
• RE: Pei Wei's ViolaWWW project: Was it prior art? christopher.jauregui@syngenta.com
• Re: Pei Wei's ViolaWWW project: Was it prior art? Christopher Barber
• Re: Pei Wei's ViolaWWW project: Was it prior art? SerpentMage (Christian Gross)
• RE: Pei Wei's ViolaWWW project: Was it prior art? Richard M. Smith
• Re: Pei Wei's ViolaWWW project: Was it prior art? Steven Pemberton
• Re: alternatives and migration scenarios Robin Berjon
• Re: alternatives and migration scenarios Dean Jackson
• alternatives and migration scenarios Michael Condouris

Wednesday, 3 September 2003

• Pei Wei's ViolaWWW project: Was it prior art? Richard M. Smith
• RE: 906 Scott Cadillac

Tuesday, 2 September 2003

• Re: Eolas - agree on the prior art ..... Hector Santos
• RE: Software Patents Prior Art: lack of due diligence by the LARGEST SOFTWARE COMPUTER IN THE WORLD Richard M. Smith
• RE: prior art and obvious. Richard M. Smith
• prior art and obvious. Alex Rivero
• Re: Software Patents Prior Art: lack of due diligence by the LARGEST SOFTWARE COMPUTER IN THE WORLD Hector Santos
• RE: Eolas - agree on the prior art ..... Stolowitz, Micah
• RE: Software Patents Prior Art: lack of due diligence by the LARGEST SOFTWARE COMPUTER IN THE WORLD Richard M. Smith
• RE: Eolas - agree on the prior art ..... Richard M. Smith
• Software Patents Prior Art: lack of due diligence by the LARGEST SOFTWARE COMPUTER IN THE WORLD Hector Santos
• Eolas - agree on the prior art ..... Hemant Desai
• More Prior Art - Smoking gun? RFC 965 "A Format for a Graphical Communication Protocol" Dec/1985 Hector Santos
• More Prior art - Early VideoTex industry Hector Santos
• Re: 906 Hector Santos
• 906 Hemant Desai
• Re: The Eolas '906 patent backgrounder Hector Santos
• Re: The Eolas '906 patent backgrounder Hector Santos
• Re: IE Thread Kade.Hansson@dpiwe.tas.gov.au
• Re: The Eolas '906 patent backgrounder Seth Johnson
• RE: The Eolas '906 patent backgrounder Scott Cadillac
• RE: The Eolas '906 patent backgrounder Scott Cadillac
• The Eolas '906 patent backgrounder Richard M. Smith

Monday, 1 September 2003

• RE: More speculative comment Richard M. Smith
• More speculative comment Jerry Mead
• Re: Why a license deal is ONLY good for Microsoft Orlando Echevarria
• RE: NeWS as prior art? Gil Hauer
• Re: Background information on Mr. Wei Pei Kimberly J. Blessing
• Re: HTML frames and the Eolas '906 patent Hector Santos
• Re: MS-EOLAS story .. Hector Santos
• More prior art - Document Storage Business Hector Santos
• RE: NeWS as prior art? Richard M. Smith
• NeWS as prior art? Gil Hauer
• HTML frames and the Eolas '906 patent Richard M. Smith
• Royalty-Free for GPLed-softw? Alex Rivero
• JavaScript and the Eolas '906 patent Richard M. Smith
• Re: IE Thread Jerry Mead
• MS-EOLAS story .. Hemant Desai

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 September 2003 22:49:26 UTC