- From: csswg-test-issue-mover <web-platform-tests-notifications@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 12:59:59 GMT
- To: public-web-platform-tests-notifications@w3.org
Originally posted as https://github.com/w3c/csswg-test/pull/1021#issuecomment-193471876 by @dholbert on 07 Mar 2016, 21:53 UTC: > Also: ideally it'd be great if the testcase included a brief HTML comment (`<!-- -->`) explaining why its assertion is justified. > > e.g. "We should render with a single-line height because..." "There should be no red because..." > > The testcase's [spec link](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-sizing-3/#percentage-sizing) kind of helps, but it doesn't directly explain the testcase -- and in fact, it kind of contradicts what your test is asserting. (It says "in some cases, the auto, min-content, [...] values of min-width and min-height do not prevent the resolution of percentage sizes of the box’s contents".) View on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/5280#issuecomment-290705275
Received on Friday, 31 March 2017 13:00:11 UTC