- From: jugglinmike <web-platform-tests-notifications@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2017 15:52:10 GMT
- To: public-web-platform-tests-notifications@w3.org
I'm in total agreement. The conditions under consideration here are unexpected in a way that may be fundamentally different, though. In this case, the server is violating the HTTP protocol. It seems unlikely that any W3C/WhatWG specification would (or could) account for violations in their dependent specifications. Don't get me wrong: I would love it if this effort actually resulted in an improvement to Chromium. Isolating this behavior was a challenge. I'm just reluctant to call this an "edge" case--"over the edge" seems more fitting. View on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/5037#issuecomment-283990395
Received on Friday, 3 March 2017 15:52:23 UTC