- From: Nikos Andronikos <web-platform-tests-notifications@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 06:18:04 GMT
- To: public-web-platform-tests-notifications@w3.org
Hey @AmeliaBR, thanks for the awesome review. **marker-005.svg** is easily fixed. I've been playing with trying to totally eliminate the anti-aliasing issues and haven't found any great solutions. Everything has some level of difference around the edges. Since this is likely to pop up in lots of our tests, I'd like to work out some sort of recommendations we can give. But it's a bit dependent on how much the differences actually matter. I'll upload a new version of **marker-005.svg** tomorrow, and run the tests through WebKit to see whether they pass or fail, then maybe try to get some input from the other browsers. Regarding your other question - I don't know of any way to mark that test result accuracy is dependent on another test passing. Maybe @gsnedders has some suggestion here? It's probably not the end of the world if a false positive occurs as long as the test it's dependent on fails. View on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/4015#issuecomment-261165249
Received on Thursday, 17 November 2016 06:18:16 UTC