Re: cc Do some follow-up for PR #2838 (#3516)

> animate-dom-01-f-isvalid.html
> animate-dom-02-f-isvalid.html
> DTD validation errors are due to script/@src being optional in SVG-in-HTML spec but not in SVG spec (I think I filed a related issue with the Relax schemas a while back)

OK yeah I vaguely recall something about that but anyway given that these are HTML files we should be testing against the conformance requirements in the HTML spec for SVG-in-HTML.

> animate-elem-40-t-isvalid.html
> The DTD validation error is on not being complete and looks like an known error in the SVG DTD: https://www.w3.org/2011/08/REC-SVG11-20110816-errata

OK so yeah we should ignore the DTD problem and just follow the spec

> It looks like uploaded .SVG files auto-detect as 'Doctype: SVG 1.1 + XHTML + MathML 3.0' - is this a RelaxNG schema or an SGML DTD?

RelaxNG


View on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/3516#issuecomment-241401176

Received on Monday, 22 August 2016 12:44:32 UTC