- From: Benjamin Poulain <web-platform-tests-notifications@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 02:05:00 GMT
- To: public-web-platform-tests-notifications@w3.org
> It's also pretty useless to have a selector for :read-only if it just means :not(:read-write). That's pretty common. Take ":link" and ":visited" for example. I would expect :read-only and :read-write to be opposite, as it is for any permission system. That what follows the principle of least astonishment IMHO. > Maybe we should take this to www-style? Yep. I do not intend to change WebKit to go against the spec. View on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/2843#issuecomment-211687381
Received on Tuesday, 19 April 2016 02:05:08 UTC