Re: [html-tests] Test that :read-only matches <input>s to which [readonly] doesn't apply (#2843)

Yes, I agree that the spec isn't particularly reasonable here, but didn't dig in to evaluate whether the weirdness is justified or not (perhaps there's a history here).
Note that Safari currently implements this as-currently-spec'd, unprefixed.

> it's not clear to me that implementors want to match the spec.

Given their response to https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-edge/platform/issues/7229941/ , the Edge folks currently seem to be in the "the spec is bad" camp.

View on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/2843#issuecomment-211583916

Received on Monday, 18 April 2016 21:18:55 UTC