- From: Roger Pack <rogerpack2005@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 21:58:53 -0600
- To: Yoav Weiss <yoavweiss@google.com>
- Cc: public-web-perf <public-web-perf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CADCGFBXKt2ZcLOnrdKdJWna7cn9X2XQr_s7-7-m+qYBe45iMdg@mail.gmail.com>
OK that looks like it should work, though I don't understand it fully. Thanks! On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 10:38 AM Yoav Weiss <yoavweiss@google.com> wrote: > Hi Roger, > > In the latest spec, when the buffer is full, the remaining entries are not > dropped on the floor unless the event handler doesn't make room for them. > See https://github.com/w3c/resource-timing/pull/168 for the specification > those changes. > > If you still believe the specification is sub-optimal, filing an issue > <https://github.com/w3c/resource-timing/issues> would be the best way to > go. If you think what's currently specified is not implemented in some > browsers, your best route would be to file an issue with them. AFAICT from wpt.fyi > results > <https://wpt.fyi/results/resource-timing?label=experimental&label=master&aligned>, > this part is implemented fairly well (even if not perfectly) across the > board. > > Cheers :) > Yoav > > On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 6:28 PM Roger Pack <rogerpack2005@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hello. >> As a note, I would have hoped that the resourcetimingbufferfull event >> would have had, as part of the event, access to the new performance entry >> that "is being dropped on the floor" so that it can be processed etc. >> >> As it is today, if people listen for that event, they are basically >> guaranteed to lose at least one Entry before they clear them all or raise >> the buffer size, etc. >> Cheers! >> >
Received on Friday, 11 October 2019 03:59:23 UTC