- From: W3C Webmaster via GitHub API <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 17:00:42 +0000
- To: public-web-perf@w3.org
- Message-Id: <E1iX6rq-0007L5-DZ@uranus.w3.org>
Issues
------
* w3c/resource-timing (+0/-0/💬1)
1 issues received 1 new comments:
- #118 should redirected navigations have a workerStart value if a previous redirect URL was intercepted (1 by yoavweiss)
https://github.com/w3c/resource-timing/issues/118 [Clarification] [needs tests] [requires group agreement]
* w3c/user-timing (+1/-0/💬7)
1 issues created:
- Allow marks and measures to be shown in developer tooling without adding it to the performance timeline (by anniesullie)
https://github.com/w3c/user-timing/issues/68
1 issues received 7 new comments:
- #68 Allow marks and measures to be shown in developer tooling without adding it to the performance timeline (7 by bgirard, npm1, rniwa, tdresser)
https://github.com/w3c/user-timing/issues/68
* w3c/page-visibility (+1/-0/💬0)
1 issues created:
- Lack of clarity on how occlusion behavior interacts with iframes (by kg)
https://github.com/w3c/page-visibility/issues/56
* w3c/server-timing (+1/-0/💬2)
1 issues created:
- Using Server-timing to carry TraceID (by plehegar)
https://github.com/w3c/server-timing/issues/65 [question]
1 issues received 2 new comments:
- #65 Using Server-timing to carry TraceID (2 by SergeyKanzhelev, yoavweiss)
https://github.com/w3c/server-timing/issues/65 [question]
Pull requests
-------------
* w3c/hr-time (+1/-0/💬0)
1 pull requests submitted:
- Prep for upcoming (by plehegar)
https://github.com/w3c/hr-time/pull/85 [editorial]
* w3c/requestidlecallback (+1/-1/💬3)
1 pull requests submitted:
- Define algorithm for determining whether high priority work exists. (by rmcilroy)
https://github.com/w3c/requestidlecallback/pull/88
2 pull requests received 3 new comments:
- #88 Define algorithm for determining whether high priority work exists. (2 by rmcilroy)
https://github.com/w3c/requestidlecallback/pull/88
- #85 Avoid calling start an idle period directly now that the event loop does it (1 by rmcilroy)
https://github.com/w3c/requestidlecallback/pull/85
1 pull requests merged:
- Avoid calling start an idle period directly now that the event loop does it
https://github.com/w3c/requestidlecallback/pull/85
Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/w3c/hr-time
* https://github.com/w3c/performance-timeline
* https://github.com/w3c/resource-timing
* https://github.com/w3c/navigation-timing
* https://github.com/w3c/user-timing
* https://github.com/w3c/beacon
* https://github.com/w3c/page-visibility
* https://github.com/w3c/preload
* https://github.com/w3c/resource-hints
* https://github.com/w3c/requestidlecallback
* https://github.com/w3c/device-memory
* https://github.com/w3c/paint-timing
* https://github.com/w3c/longtasks
* https://github.com/w3c/server-timing
Received on Tuesday, 19 November 2019 17:00:48 UTC