- From: W3C Webmaster via GitHub API <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 17:00:42 +0000
- To: public-web-perf@w3.org
- Message-Id: <E1iX6rq-0007L5-DZ@uranus.w3.org>
Issues ------ * w3c/resource-timing (+0/-0/💬1) 1 issues received 1 new comments: - #118 should redirected navigations have a workerStart value if a previous redirect URL was intercepted (1 by yoavweiss) https://github.com/w3c/resource-timing/issues/118 [Clarification] [needs tests] [requires group agreement] * w3c/user-timing (+1/-0/💬7) 1 issues created: - Allow marks and measures to be shown in developer tooling without adding it to the performance timeline (by anniesullie) https://github.com/w3c/user-timing/issues/68 1 issues received 7 new comments: - #68 Allow marks and measures to be shown in developer tooling without adding it to the performance timeline (7 by bgirard, npm1, rniwa, tdresser) https://github.com/w3c/user-timing/issues/68 * w3c/page-visibility (+1/-0/💬0) 1 issues created: - Lack of clarity on how occlusion behavior interacts with iframes (by kg) https://github.com/w3c/page-visibility/issues/56 * w3c/server-timing (+1/-0/💬2) 1 issues created: - Using Server-timing to carry TraceID (by plehegar) https://github.com/w3c/server-timing/issues/65 [question] 1 issues received 2 new comments: - #65 Using Server-timing to carry TraceID (2 by SergeyKanzhelev, yoavweiss) https://github.com/w3c/server-timing/issues/65 [question] Pull requests ------------- * w3c/hr-time (+1/-0/💬0) 1 pull requests submitted: - Prep for upcoming (by plehegar) https://github.com/w3c/hr-time/pull/85 [editorial] * w3c/requestidlecallback (+1/-1/💬3) 1 pull requests submitted: - Define algorithm for determining whether high priority work exists. (by rmcilroy) https://github.com/w3c/requestidlecallback/pull/88 2 pull requests received 3 new comments: - #88 Define algorithm for determining whether high priority work exists. (2 by rmcilroy) https://github.com/w3c/requestidlecallback/pull/88 - #85 Avoid calling start an idle period directly now that the event loop does it (1 by rmcilroy) https://github.com/w3c/requestidlecallback/pull/85 1 pull requests merged: - Avoid calling start an idle period directly now that the event loop does it https://github.com/w3c/requestidlecallback/pull/85 Repositories tracked by this digest: ----------------------------------- * https://github.com/w3c/hr-time * https://github.com/w3c/performance-timeline * https://github.com/w3c/resource-timing * https://github.com/w3c/navigation-timing * https://github.com/w3c/user-timing * https://github.com/w3c/beacon * https://github.com/w3c/page-visibility * https://github.com/w3c/preload * https://github.com/w3c/resource-hints * https://github.com/w3c/requestidlecallback * https://github.com/w3c/device-memory * https://github.com/w3c/paint-timing * https://github.com/w3c/longtasks * https://github.com/w3c/server-timing
Received on Tuesday, 19 November 2019 17:00:48 UTC