- From: W3C Webmaster via GitHub API <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2018 17:00:39 +0000
- To: public-web-perf@w3.org
- Message-Id: <E1faOfP-0006xl-Md@uranus.w3.org>
Issues
------
* w3c/hr-time (+0/-1/💬1)
1 issues received 1 new comments:
- #56 Reducing the precision of the DOMHighResTimeStamp resolution (1 by yoavweiss)
https://github.com/w3c/hr-time/issues/56 [security]
1 issues closed:
- Reducing the precision of the DOMHighResTimeStamp resolution https://github.com/w3c/hr-time/issues/56 [security]
* w3c/resource-timing (+0/-0/💬1)
1 issues received 1 new comments:
- #96 Clarify behavior of setResourceTimingBufferSize (1 by toddreifsteck)
https://github.com/w3c/resource-timing/issues/96 [discuss_280618] [test:missing-coverage]
* w3c/navigation-timing (+2/-0/💬13)
2 issues created:
- Should navigationEntry's navigationType be updated according to the parent page ? (by shacharz)
https://github.com/w3c/navigation-timing/issues/85
- secureConnectionStart definition is inconsistent with ResourceTiming (by npm1)
https://github.com/w3c/navigation-timing/issues/84
4 issues received 13 new comments:
- #85 Should navigationEntry's navigationType be updated according to the parent page ? (7 by shacharz, igrigorik, yoavweiss)
https://github.com/w3c/navigation-timing/issues/85 [test:missing-coverage]
- #65 Please fix at least your broken links, if you want anyone to ever make any sense of your specs (3 by igrigorik, yoavweiss, bzbarsky)
https://github.com/w3c/navigation-timing/issues/65
- #78 Should processing model cut the steps defined by PerformanceResourceTiming? (2 by igrigorik, yoavweiss)
https://github.com/w3c/navigation-timing/issues/78
- #84 secureConnectionStart definition is inconsistent with ResourceTiming (1 by toddreifsteck)
https://github.com/w3c/navigation-timing/issues/84
* w3c/page-visibility (+1/-1/💬4)
1 issues created:
- Provide a clear way to hook into "document becomes visible/hidden" (by siusin)
https://github.com/w3c/page-visibility/issues/40
2 issues received 4 new comments:
- #37 typo: "5.3 onvisiblitychange event handler" (3 by yoavweiss, siusin)
https://github.com/w3c/page-visibility/issues/37
- #39 Why does visibilitychange fire after pagehide in the unload flow? (1 by spanicker)
https://github.com/w3c/page-visibility/issues/39
1 issues closed:
- typo: "5.3 onvisiblitychange event handler" https://github.com/w3c/page-visibility/issues/37
* w3c/preload (+1/-0/💬7)
1 issues created:
- spec shuold mention that relList must also be implemented if preload is implemented (by safareli)
https://github.com/w3c/preload/issues/126
1 issues received 7 new comments:
- #7 how to feature detect? (7 by safareli, getify, yoavweiss)
https://github.com/w3c/preload/issues/7
* w3c/resource-hints (+0/-0/💬1)
1 issues received 1 new comments:
- #72 Hinting HTTP Alternative Services (1 by LPardue)
https://github.com/w3c/resource-hints/issues/72
* w3c/longtasks (+1/-0/💬0)
1 issues created:
- Can we get call stack ? (by kshyju)
https://github.com/w3c/longtasks/issues/42
* w3c/server-timing (+1/-0/💬2)
1 issues created:
- Relax (or remove) trailer processing requirement (by igrigorik)
https://github.com/w3c/server-timing/issues/58
1 issues received 2 new comments:
- #58 Relax (or remove) trailer processing requirement (2 by igrigorik, cvazac)
https://github.com/w3c/server-timing/issues/58
Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/w3c/hr-time
* https://github.com/w3c/performance-timeline
* https://github.com/w3c/resource-timing
* https://github.com/w3c/navigation-timing
* https://github.com/w3c/user-timing
* https://github.com/w3c/beacon
* https://github.com/w3c/page-visibility
* https://github.com/w3c/preload
* https://github.com/w3c/resource-hints
* https://github.com/w3c/requestidlecallback
* https://github.com/w3c/device-memory
* https://github.com/w3c/paint-timing
* https://github.com/w3c/longtasks
* https://github.com/w3c/server-timing
Received on Tuesday, 3 July 2018 17:00:45 UTC