- From: W3C Webmaster via GitHub API <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2018 17:00:39 +0000
- To: public-web-perf@w3.org
- Message-Id: <E1faOfP-0006xl-Md@uranus.w3.org>
Issues ------ * w3c/hr-time (+0/-1/💬1) 1 issues received 1 new comments: - #56 Reducing the precision of the DOMHighResTimeStamp resolution (1 by yoavweiss) https://github.com/w3c/hr-time/issues/56 [security] 1 issues closed: - Reducing the precision of the DOMHighResTimeStamp resolution https://github.com/w3c/hr-time/issues/56 [security] * w3c/resource-timing (+0/-0/💬1) 1 issues received 1 new comments: - #96 Clarify behavior of setResourceTimingBufferSize (1 by toddreifsteck) https://github.com/w3c/resource-timing/issues/96 [discuss_280618] [test:missing-coverage] * w3c/navigation-timing (+2/-0/💬13) 2 issues created: - Should navigationEntry's navigationType be updated according to the parent page ? (by shacharz) https://github.com/w3c/navigation-timing/issues/85 - secureConnectionStart definition is inconsistent with ResourceTiming (by npm1) https://github.com/w3c/navigation-timing/issues/84 4 issues received 13 new comments: - #85 Should navigationEntry's navigationType be updated according to the parent page ? (7 by shacharz, igrigorik, yoavweiss) https://github.com/w3c/navigation-timing/issues/85 [test:missing-coverage] - #65 Please fix at least your broken links, if you want anyone to ever make any sense of your specs (3 by igrigorik, yoavweiss, bzbarsky) https://github.com/w3c/navigation-timing/issues/65 - #78 Should processing model cut the steps defined by PerformanceResourceTiming? (2 by igrigorik, yoavweiss) https://github.com/w3c/navigation-timing/issues/78 - #84 secureConnectionStart definition is inconsistent with ResourceTiming (1 by toddreifsteck) https://github.com/w3c/navigation-timing/issues/84 * w3c/page-visibility (+1/-1/💬4) 1 issues created: - Provide a clear way to hook into "document becomes visible/hidden" (by siusin) https://github.com/w3c/page-visibility/issues/40 2 issues received 4 new comments: - #37 typo: "5.3 onvisiblitychange event handler" (3 by yoavweiss, siusin) https://github.com/w3c/page-visibility/issues/37 - #39 Why does visibilitychange fire after pagehide in the unload flow? (1 by spanicker) https://github.com/w3c/page-visibility/issues/39 1 issues closed: - typo: "5.3 onvisiblitychange event handler" https://github.com/w3c/page-visibility/issues/37 * w3c/preload (+1/-0/💬7) 1 issues created: - spec shuold mention that relList must also be implemented if preload is implemented (by safareli) https://github.com/w3c/preload/issues/126 1 issues received 7 new comments: - #7 how to feature detect? (7 by safareli, getify, yoavweiss) https://github.com/w3c/preload/issues/7 * w3c/resource-hints (+0/-0/💬1) 1 issues received 1 new comments: - #72 Hinting HTTP Alternative Services (1 by LPardue) https://github.com/w3c/resource-hints/issues/72 * w3c/longtasks (+1/-0/💬0) 1 issues created: - Can we get call stack ? (by kshyju) https://github.com/w3c/longtasks/issues/42 * w3c/server-timing (+1/-0/💬2) 1 issues created: - Relax (or remove) trailer processing requirement (by igrigorik) https://github.com/w3c/server-timing/issues/58 1 issues received 2 new comments: - #58 Relax (or remove) trailer processing requirement (2 by igrigorik, cvazac) https://github.com/w3c/server-timing/issues/58 Repositories tracked by this digest: ----------------------------------- * https://github.com/w3c/hr-time * https://github.com/w3c/performance-timeline * https://github.com/w3c/resource-timing * https://github.com/w3c/navigation-timing * https://github.com/w3c/user-timing * https://github.com/w3c/beacon * https://github.com/w3c/page-visibility * https://github.com/w3c/preload * https://github.com/w3c/resource-hints * https://github.com/w3c/requestidlecallback * https://github.com/w3c/device-memory * https://github.com/w3c/paint-timing * https://github.com/w3c/longtasks * https://github.com/w3c/server-timing
Received on Tuesday, 3 July 2018 17:00:45 UTC