On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 2:36 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 7:40 PM, Chris Harrelson <chrishtr@chromium.org> > wrote: > > Why not? If the DOM is modified, it should apply its updates on the next > > frame, no? > > Making the load event synchronous just if the style sheet happens to > be in a cache seems like a bad API. You effectively change the API > contract of <link> based on an externality. > I see, ok. I think you're suggesting that the load event should be async. I agree. > > Furthermore, it would introduce all the problems we're trying to get > rid of by removing synchronous mutation events (at least all of the > problems related to synchronous insertion mutation events). > > > -- > https://annevankesteren.nl/ >
Received on Wednesday, 17 January 2018 18:56:49 UTC