- From: Ilya Grigorik <igrigorik@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 09:38:29 -0700
- To: Todd Reifsteck <toddreif@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Shubhie Panicker <panicker@google.com>, Nolan Lawson <nolawson@microsoft.com>, public-web-perf <public-web-perf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CADXXVKr4mbiyL2X9g5f+p7Sxt6ykPv4Yx3Rn88aqS5+w_6pkxw@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks Todd! On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 11:02 PM, Todd Reifsteck <toddreif@microsoft.com> wrote: > I have a last-minute doctor conflict, but don’t want to hold the call up. > Nolan will attend. My comments inline. > > > > Thanks! > > Todd > > > > *From:* Shubhie Panicker [mailto:panicker@google.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 21, 2017 5:12 PM > *To:* Ilya Grigorik <igrigorik@google.com> > *Cc:* public-web-perf <public-web-perf@w3.org> > *Subject:* Re: [3/22/17] webperf group call @ 10AM PST > > > > I'd like to add another item: surfacing memory related signals to > developers. > > We've been evaluating couple proposals: > > 1. surface device memory > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1O0fKj5q4U8EF2LZdScXB6c02laQmixPekG-fuCQUHys/edit> > as proxy for (or component of) *device class* > > 2. surface memory pressure > <https://github.com/WICG/memory-pressure/blob/master/explainer.md> signal > (positive signal at TPAC but mixed signals from developers recently) > > We'd love to get some early feedback on this. > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Ilya Grigorik <igrigorik@google.com> > wrote: > > Hangout: https://hangouts.google.com/hangouts/_/chromium.org/webperf-wg > > > > *# Agenda* > > - *Beacon API* > > > - Progress on https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/4024 > > [toddreif] Blocked on other work. Coming in next 1-2 weeks. (Sorry… ☹) > > - Transition to CR? > > [toddreif] Yes, I believe we have sufficient evidence. > > - *Page Visibility L2* > > > - Test for prerender: https://github.com/w3c/web- > platform-tests/pull/5185 > > > - Transition to PR? Blocked on above > > [toddreif] Yes, I believe this should work. > > - *HR Time L2* > > > - Check-in on prompt to unload test: https://github.com/w3c/hr- > time/issues/32 > > [toddreif] I suggest it be started with a manual test. Any automation will > require that as a first step anyway. > > - *Performance Timeline L2* > > > - Editorial + cleanup updates PR: https://github.com/w3c/ > performance-timeline/pull/75 > - Transition to PR? > > [todreif] Both LGTM > > - *Resource Timing* > > > - Review TAO tests: https://github.com/w3c/resource-timing/issues/92 > > > - Unblocks L1 PR transition > > [toddreif] Haven’t had time to review, but don’t block on me. We should > validate that IE11/Edge both pass the new tests as we know they implement > both old and new version of TAO spec. > > - *Triage open Preload & User Timing issues* > > > - https://github.com/w3c/preload/issues > - https://github.com/w3c/user-timing/issues > > *# Administrative* > > - Transition Long Tasks to WG > - Transition Server Timing to WG > > > - Blink I2I: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!topic/ > blink-dev/y3qwr490Fc4 > > [toddreif] We should transition all specs previously agreed upon. > > - Next steps on updated charter > > [toddreif] Please proceed on this assuming all specs have been added again. > > - Install PR preview and diff tool on all perf repos? > > > - https://github.com/tobie/pr-preview#install > > [toddreif] No opinion. Don’t block on me. > > >
Received on Wednesday, 22 March 2017 16:39:42 UTC