W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-perf@w3.org > January 2017

Re: [1/18/17] webperf group call @ 10AM PST

From: Ilya Grigorik <igrigorik@google.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 02:12:52 +0100
Message-ID: <CADXXVKqXMuHuq9Xy5eZn4shjspjd6TTJjHgT+bP+nQ4w2CJrmA@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-web-perf <public-web-perf@w3.org>
   - Resource Timing L2
      - Increase limit of 150 for PerformanceEntrys?
      <https://github.com/w3c/resource-timing/issues/89>


On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 1:43 AM, Ilya Grigorik <igrigorik@google.com> wrote:

> Hangout: https://hangouts.google.com/hangouts/_/chromium.org/webperf-wg
>
> --- Agenda:
>
>    - *Nav Timing L2*
>       - Report URL in "name" attribute instead of "document"?
>       <https://github.com/w3c/navigation-timing/issues/59>
>       - Data bias issues due to deferring reporting of all nav timing
>       metrics to the load event
>       <https://github.com/w3c/navigation-timing/issues/50#issuecomment-268919388>
>
>
>
>    -
> *Performance Timeline *
>       - L2: Lack of feature detection option for new entry types
>       <https://github.com/w3c/performance-timeline/issues/64>
>       - L3: Ability to observe past set of performance entries
>       <https://github.com/w3c/performance-timeline/issues/56#issuecomment-268922807>
>
>
>    - Long Tasks V1 progress updates
>    - FP & FCP data analysis results
>    <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XVP9jaZT7acQtK5O6vO-mIz31i5iB-pZn1S41_YP6p0/edit#> comparing
>    paint time with subsequent timestamps
>
>
>    - *Resource Timing L1 *
>       - From PR request review: "It appears that Timing-Allow-Origin was
>       not tested. I think the implementation report is incomplete without tests
>       for that feature."
>
>
>    - requestIdleCallback L1 CR
>    <https://github.com/w3c/requestidlecallback/issues/48> check-in..
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 18 January 2017 01:14:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 18 January 2017 01:14:05 UTC