- From: Ilya Grigorik <igrigorik@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 14:48:54 -0800
- To: Karthik Krishnamurthy <karthik3186@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-web-perf <public-web-perf@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 8 December 2017 22:49:58 UTC
Hi Karthik. Relevant discussions: - https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/4266#issuecomment-263992912 - https://github.com/w3c/resource-timing/commit/64d7eed8384c563a5a60a90acbfee77f51753b34 The decision is/was that L1 and L2 both specify that the UA *may* surface such entries. In L3 I'm hoping we can make that a MUST. ig On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Karthik Krishnamurthy < karthik3186@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > Currently, the way RT data is applied for 4xx and 5xx resources differ > significantly across browsers. On Firefox and IE (and possibly Edge), RT > data is fully available for 4xx and 5xx resources (assuming TAO applies). > However on Chrome, RT data is completely unavailable for 4xx and 5xx > resources. Two places where this is talked about are: > > 1. https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=460879#c19 > 2. https://github.com/w3c/resource-timing/issues/12 > > In both places, it seems like there is an acknowledgement that 4xx and 5xx > resources behave the same as any other resource and so RT data should be > available. > > The question I have is whether clarification of 4xx and 5xx resources is > part of the L3 milestones? If so, that might address Chrome's long standing > issue of not providing RT data for such resources. > > Thanks, > Karthik. >
Received on Friday, 8 December 2017 22:49:58 UTC