RE: CR Draft for new hr-time REC

This looks like a good publishing point to me.

Ilya?
Others?

-Todd

-----Original Message-----
From: Philippe Le Hegaret [mailto:plh@w3.org] 
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 1:35 PM
To: public-web-perf <public-web-perf@w3.org>; Ilya Grigorik <igrigorik@google.com>; Todd Reifsteck <toddreif@microsoft.com>
Subject: CR Draft for new hr-time REC

I prepared a CR draft for the next hr-time recommendation:
  https://rawgit.com/w3c/hr-time/hr-time-2-CR/index.html


Now that the privacy review is done and gone, it removed the last blocker we had.

I removed translateTime, figuring we won't get that one ready on time for this cycle.

I moved the service workers to informative since I don't think we're depending on it at this time.

Compared to hr-time-1:
[[
     Defines a precise definition of time origin for the purpose of all performance timeline related specifications;
     Provides the base definition for the Performance interface, including support for the Performance.now method in Web Workers [WORKERS];
     To mitigate cache attacks, the recommended minimum resolution of the Performance interface should be set to 5 microseconds.
]]

Let me wrong know I got anything wrong or missed something.

Philippe

Received on Saturday, 23 January 2016 00:33:21 UTC