On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Shubhie Panicker <panicker@google.com> wrote: > - Re: extensions > We *may* be able to indicate something generic here. Prior investigation > <https://codereview.chromium.org/1615523002/> indicates that it's very > difficult to properly account for scripts spawned by extensions. > I think we want to be really careful with this one.. Yes, extensions can definitely affect runtime of the page, both in the early stages of the page load and while the page is active, and it would be nice to get a handle on that. However, we can't simply expose which extensions (e.g. script urls and related bits) the user is running due to security/privacy concerns. It's a problem worth thinking about, but I would mark it as an explicit non-goal for the v1 we're discussing here..
Received on Friday, 5 August 2016 22:38:30 UTC