- From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 21:39:11 -0400
- To: Ilya Grigorik <igrigorik@google.com>
- Cc: public-web-perf <public-web-perf@w3.org>
On 04/27/2016 07:23 PM, Ilya Grigorik wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org > <mailto:plh@w3.org>> wrote: > > I agree. The spec did not indicate either way until we landed > [1] and I > think we can: (a) keep it as such for L1, (b) resolve it in L2. With > that in mind, we would probably need to back out that commit for L1? > > > Yes, in the v1 branch. gh-pages should not be affected by L1 imho. > > > Agreed. Will you make the change, or do you want me to? I added them in the list. Also created the V1 branch: https://rawgit.com/w3c/resource-timing/V1/index.html In particular, check my changes and notes in the section "4.2 Resources Included in the PerformanceResourceTiming Interface" https://rawgit.com/w3c/resource-timing/V1/index.html#resources-included Philippe
Received on Thursday, 28 April 2016 01:39:15 UTC