- From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 20:03:36 -0400
- To: public-web-perf <public-web-perf@w3.org>
Available at http://www.w3.org/2015/06/24-webperf-minutes.html Text version: Web Performance Working Group Teleconference 24 Jun 2015 See also: [2]IRC log [2] http://www.w3.org/2015/06/24-webperf-irc Attendees Present Plh, Ilya, Bernhard, Todd, Michael Regrets Yoav Chair Ilya Scribe plh Contents * [3]Topics 1. [4]Review charter feedback and proposed process updates 2. [5]time origin & workerStart 3. [6]attribute filtering 4. [7]revise "return copy" 5. [8]credentials in URLs 6. [9]linkNegotationStart 7. [10]Navigation Timing 2 8. [11]Call schedule for the summer * [12]Summary of Action Items __________________________________________________________ Review charter feedback and proposed process updates [13]https://w3c.github.io/charter-webperf/ [13] https://w3c.github.io/charter-webperf/ Plh: I'll make it official tomorrow <igrigorik> [14]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-perf/2015Ju n/0080.html [14] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-perf/2015Jun/0080.html /TR/performance-timeline would be in sync with the github draft. /TR/performance-timeline-<n> /TR/performance-timeline todd: should we have a branch in the repo that also contains that snapshot? Ilya: yes, snapshot with a branch seem reasonnable ... so the most recent would be gh-pages? plh: yes Resolved: Performance Timeline 2 can be published as a FPWD Resolved: User Timing 2 can be published as a FPWD Resolved: Server Tming can be published as a FPWD Resolved: Preload can be published as a FPWD /TR/performance-timeline -> /TR/performance-timeline-2 /TR/performance-timeline-1 Resolved: adopted the new versioning and branching Resolved: WDs should be automatically published [15]http://www.w3.org/TR/navigation-timing-2/ [15] http://www.w3.org/TR/navigation-timing-2/ time origin & workerStart <igrigorik> [16]https://github.com/w3c/hr-time/pull/6 [16] https://github.com/w3c/hr-time/pull/6 Ilya: we should deprecate workerStart in favor of a translated time based approach Todd: didn't get feedback from Justin yet, makes sense from him. ... we should wait for Boris to give a +1 as well plh: you don't need to deprecate workerStart. it never made it into a REC. just removing it is fine. attribute filtering <igrigorik> [17]https://github.com/w3c/performance-timeline/pull/11 [17] https://github.com/w3c/performance-timeline/pull/11 Ilya: [summarizing the history]. [18]https://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/w3c/perfo rmance-timeline/blob/592576c94599a88aa6183d827e54fa46d822cdfb/i ndex.html [18] https://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/w3c/performance-timeline/blob/592576c94599a88aa6183d827e54fa46d822cdfb/index.html Todd: ok to merge Ilya: I'll merge and ping the list revise "return copy" [19]https://github.com/w3c/performance-timeline/issues/20 [19] https://github.com/w3c/performance-timeline/issues/20 Ilya: Chrome and Firefox do not return a copy of the array ... IE does ... can we remove the "copy"? it's still ok to return a copy Todd: looks good to me <mpb> Do we need to change language on the Performance Observer interface too? [20]http://w3c.github.io/performance-timeline/#the-performance- observer-interface [20] http://w3c.github.io/performance-timeline/#the-performance-observer-interface Ilya: yes, perf observer shouldn't return a copy either credentials in URLs [21]https://github.com/w3c/resource-timing/issues/7 [21] https://github.com/w3c/resource-timing/issues/7 Todd: it's been suggested that exposing credentials in URLs through RT makes it easier to capture the credentials ... the move to Fetch will disallow this and fetch will speak to it Ilya: we can drop the credentials, but you won't get the same value for the url. and if you use different credentials, you won't be able to differentiate it ... I propose to close it as "wontfix" ... and let the browsers make their own decision (ie do as IE by disallowing that type of request) Resolved: wontfix linkNegotationStart plh: drop it? [22]http://w3c.github.io/navigation-timing/#widl-PerformanceNav igationTiming-linkNegotiationStart [22] http://w3c.github.io/navigation-timing/#widl-PerformanceNavigationTiming-linkNegotiationStart Ilya: we haven't been successful at implementing ... we could ressurect it in the future if we have access to the data. Resolved: drop linkNegotiationStart Navigation Timing 2 Todd: ALPN id / nextHopProtocol . has value and no plan for implementation ... ditto for redirectCount ... should we do a snapshot of NT2? plh: pb is that only IE supports it on top of performance timeline [discussion on the need to do snapshots of HRT2, PT2, and RT first] Ilya: open question related to nextHopProtocol into exposing too much networking information Todd: didn't think of that yet Ilya: redirectCount. was about making resource timing multi-fetch friendly ... if NT2 gets defined on top of RT, we won't need that Todd: also some concerns about security/privacy of that one Call schedule for the summer Ilya: next one is 07/15 ... then 08/12 [adjourned] Summary of Action Items [End of minutes]
Received on Friday, 26 June 2015 00:03:42 UTC