Re: webperf: repo(s) and issues

+1 for both #1 and #2.

On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org> wrote:

> Hi Folks (especially Marcos and Tobin),
>
> we'd like some feedback on how to (re)organize our github repo and
> issues to make sure it fits how folks would like to track us.
>
> At the moment, we have one github repo [1] and a bad tracking system
> [2].
>
> The thinking is to have one repo per specification and use github issues
> instead.
>
> Do folks have a preference between something like
> 1.
>  https://github.com/w3c/navigation-timing
>  https://github.com/w3c/page-visibility
>  (etc)
>
> 2.
>  https://github.com/w3cwebperf/navigation-timing
>  https://github.com/w3cwebperf/page-visibility
>  (etc)
>
> The first one has the advantage to be with the others but folks might
> get lost in the numbers of repo under the w3c account.
>
> The second one means that we stay isolated, ie easier to find our repos
> but folks might not expect them to be separated.
>
> Any objection against asking everyone to use github issues?
>
> Philippe
>
>
> [1] https://github.com/w3c/web-performance
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2010/webperf/track/
>
>
>
>