Re: negotiated protocol in Navigation and Resource Timing from Ilya Grigorik on 2014-10-22 (public-web-perf@w3.org from October 2014)

From: Ilya Grigorik <igrigorik@google.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 11:49:01 -0700
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, William Chan (陈智昌) <willchan@chromium.org>, Peter Lepeska <bizzbyster@gmail.com>, Tobin Titus <tobint@microsoft.com>, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, public-web-perf <public-web-perf@w3.org>, Tony Gentilcore <tonyg@chromium.org>
Message-ID: <CADXXVKrZT4s0aWFSEG8J-LsORKYQ7LeLDZog-Q=gNqrJPxvT4w@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
wrote:

> When it comes to URLs, protocol refers to the bit before the ":". In
> the platform's API landscape, I think that's the only thing "protocol"
> has meant thus far. And getting at the bit before the ":" is still
> useful. It's just wildly different from what you're talking about.
>

Hmm, I guess I am overlooking ftp, mailto, etc. Ok, back to
"networkProtocol".

Updated: https://github.com/w3c/navigation-timing/pull/4 - how does that
look?

ig

Received on Wednesday, 22 October 2014 18:50:08 UTC