- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 19:20:29 +0200
- To: Ilya Grigorik <igrigorik@google.com>
- Cc: William Chan (ιζΊζ) <willchan@chromium.org>, Peter Lepeska <bizzbyster@gmail.com>, Tobin Titus <tobint@microsoft.com>, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, public-web-perf <public-web-perf@w3.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Tony Gentilcore <tonyg@chromium.org>
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Ilya Grigorik <igrigorik@google.com> wrote:
> Ah, I always assumed we'd expose both, but you're right, the functionality
> we've discussed previously is all on Request... Hmm, will have to noodle on
> this one some more. In the meantime, this is a good argument for why
> "protocol" + {transfer, decoded}Sizes should, in fact, be exposed via NT/RT.
Note that given https://url.spec.whatwg.org/#api the term "protocol"
is unfortunately somewhat intertwined with "scheme" for many web
developers. If we could expose it as "transport" or some such I think
that would be clearer.
--
https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 20 October 2014 17:20:56 UTC