Re: negotiated protocol in Navigation and Resource Timing

On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> Gave my feedback on the issue. I think you misunderstand -- ALPN isn't
> required to be used to use its protocol identifiers as a name space. That's
> what a lot of protocols are currently doing (e.g., RTC, TURN).


Doh, you're right, misread your original proposal. Thanks for the
clarification!

How about this:
https://github.com/w3c/navigation-timing/issues/2#issuecomment-59150636 -
getting closer?

ig