W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-perf@w3.org > June 2014

Re: [RequestAnimationFrame]: thrown exceptions and user experience

From: James Robinson <jamesr@chromium.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 12:01:55 -0700
Message-ID: <CAD73mdKYaFFo-3CA5PFcoEpRLdjxm056S3dzxUN+TJPrxRg1kA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Cc: "public-web-perf@w3.org" <public-web-perf@w3.org>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:

> On 6/23/14, 1:22 PM, Jake Verbaten wrote:
>
>>  > If calling the operation resulted in an exception being thrown, then
>> catch that exception and ignore it.
>>
>
> The exception should be reported as an uncaught exception, and is in at
> least Chrome and Firefox.  The fact that the spec says to ignore it is a
> spec bug that needs fixing, I agree.
>

What is the correct incantation to say "Treat this exception as uncaught
and continue with the algorithm" in the spec?

- James
Received on Monday, 23 June 2014 19:02:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:38 UTC