W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-perf@w3.org > June 2014

Re: Event and DOMHighResTimeStamp

From: Rick Byers <rbyers@google.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 16:32:49 -0400
Message-ID: <CAFUtAY-FjXAVT5116TGYaERkDnj6Cwj7LhpfrTUQvHiR9sAAUQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, public-web-perf <public-web-perf@w3.org>, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org> wrote:

> On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 10:45 +0200, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org> wrote:
> > > The bottom line was that we felt it was a bit out of place for us to
> > > extend the Event interface in the HRT spec. I believe you were
> > > uncomfortable in adding it in the DOM specification because the time
> > > origin is defined in terms of the HTML navigation definition. Is that
> > > still you're thinking and do you still believe we should be the one to
> > > extend the Event interface?
> >
> > Yeah that changed, see
> >
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-whatwg-archive/2014May/0046.html
> > and replies. We are experimenting in Gecko
> > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77992 and once that
> > succeeds I plan on updating the specification.
>
> Thank you Anne (and others) for the update.
>
> Rick, unless you say otherwise, I'm closing your original issue since it
> will (hopefully) be addressed in the DOM specification instead,
>

Thanks for confirming with me, I wasn't aware of the WHATWG discussion.
 Yes if Anne is willing, having this in the DOM spec seems better to me.

Philippe
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 13 June 2014 20:33:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:38 UTC