Re: Notification for new navigation timing entries

On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Eli Perelman <> wrote:

> I actually prefer the control you outlined with the MutationObserver
> proposal. Again, I believe the callback should receive a single event with
> an array of entries instead of the inconsistent array of events with a
> single entry.

The consistency part is debatable since MutationObserver API returns an
array of events [1]. And given that's the case, I'd argue we should do the
same? It's not clear to me that there are any benefits to adding another
layer of indirection?


Received on Monday, 8 December 2014 18:23:53 UTC