- From: Chase Douglas <chase@newrelic.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 10:39:45 -0700
- To: Ilya Grigorik <igrigorik@google.com>
- Cc: public-web-perf <public-web-perf@w3.org>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Message-ID: <CAKNWE6GWmuwX87B9C9LBBSsFaAJAqPFcXgAO3Z0g9sMtVLD_ig@mail.gmail.com>
I made some comments in the doc itself. Is this alright, or should we be sending all comments to the list? Thanks! On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Ilya Grigorik <igrigorik@google.com>wrote: > Google search is rolling out <a ping> to mobile clients that support it > and based on our measurements its saving 200-400ms on every click [1]. The > latency savings by themselves are, of course, a huge win, but just as > importantly, our metrics also show a significant improvement in number of > successful navigations (one less redirect to go wrong + faster load of > destination site). > > a) Above should address the previously raised concerns over usefulness of > <a ping> (and by implication, Beacon). > b) <a ping> lacks cross-browser support (limited to Safari and Chrome), > which makes deployment a non-trivial exercise. > > As a result, I believe that having a cross-browser implementation of > Beacon API would be a big performance win. Plus, Beacon is also much more > flexible and would enable many additional optimization opportunities, > including optimizing for battery life of mobile handsets... In short, we > need Beacon API! > > On that note, Jonas and myself have put together a doc outlining some > feedback and suggestions on current proposal: > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KSDg9ji53l-IrL6U5g1vvD96KIbZoQj1iUX4KwVvORM/edit# > > Would love to hear any thoughts or feedback. > > ig > > [1] https://plus.google.com/+IlyaGrigorik/posts/fPJNzUf76Nx >
Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2013 17:40:14 UTC