W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-perf@w3.org > October 2013

Re: [ResourceTiming] Handling of "resourcetimingbufferfull" events makes no sense

From: Arvind Jain <arvind@google.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 19:05:01 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOYaDdOauKyoDC5M1uQiuhbyNH5zeMDfTdFw08u+Jj_7EWhKKw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Cc: Jatinder Mann <jmann@microsoft.com>, public-web-perf <public-web-perf@w3.org>
And re. Performance extending EventTarget, do we have to do it?
Arvind


On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:

> On 10/1/13 6:30 PM, Jatinder Mann wrote:
>
>> What do you think of this proposed definition of the
>> onresourcetimingbufferfull attribute:
>>
>> The event handler for the resourcetimingbufferfull event. Immediately
>> after the buffer used to store the list of PerformanceResourceTiming
>> resources becomes full, the User Agent must fire a simple event named
>> resourcetimingbufferfull that bubbles, isn't cancelable, has no default
>> action, at the Performance object.
>>
>
> That sounds good, thanks!
>
> -Boris
>
Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2013 02:05:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:37 UTC