- From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 13:52:52 -0500
- To: public-web-perf <public-web-perf@w3.org>
Available at http://www.w3.org/2013/02/13-webperf-minutes.html 13 Feb 2013 See also: [2]IRC log [2] http://www.w3.org/2013/02/13-webperf-irc Attendees Present Arvind, Philippe, Ganesh, Alois, Daniel, James, Jatinder Chair Jatinder Scribe plh Contents 1. [3]Testing of User Timing 2. [4]Resource Timing cross origin redirect 3. [5]Navigation Timing 2 4. [6]Beacon API 5. [7]Prerender 6. [8]other specs 7. [9]Page Visibility, RAF 8. [10]Milestones 9. [11]bandwidth testing issue __________________________________________________________ Testing of User Timing Jatinder: I recommend we move the tests from Intel to approved ... I'll look at the resource timing tests later ... I'll move the user timing tests Resource Timing cross origin redirect Jatinder: I'll respond to Pan on that. Didn't close on what to do yet. I think he has a point on per resource point Navigation Timing 2 Jatinder: one of the goal is perceive latency and with pre-render, the latency changes ... should we add an attribute preRenderSwitch to NV2? ... today, we get duration. would be interesting to have the delta between loadEvent and preRenderSwitch ... it seems logical to me at least James: sounds good to me. it ties into page visibility as well Jatinder: we should make it clear that this is not real time performance but rather data to understand page load performance ... I'll follow up by mail ... we'll have to be careful on how preRenderSwitch will come off Beacon API Jatinder: sent mail about this regarding the relationship with XHR ... so we don't have to reinvent everything ... seems like there is interest ... I was hoping we can continue exploring, so let's not cut it from our list ... in a perfect world, I would love to have XHR take it on Alois: yes, this would require some input from our side. let's try to reuse here ... hopefully it will get into XHR Jatinder: it seems we'll need to provide guidance to them ... we'll send them a proposal Prerender Arvind: I started to write it Jatinder: I have a bunch of questions and will hold until you come up with something Arvind: two ways, link tag and when the browser does it (like typing in the address bar) ... I'm focusing with the link tag Jatinder: yes, I don't think we should define heuristic indeeed ... should we say that "user agents can use heuristics" ? ... should we say something about prerendering https? Arvind: we waited to avoid side effect Daniel: do we have data on side effects? Arvind: not really, I'll follow up Jatinder: should we leave the spec open or not? ... also a performance impact. Should we put limits? ... it seems logical to one, rather than the whole result page Arvind: ok, I'll keep working on it Jatinder: if you can share the documentation you have, that would be nice other specs Jatinder: resource priorities, diagnostic Page Visibility, RAF Plh: we're on track Milestones Plh: are the milestones correct? Arvind, Jatinder: yes bandwidth testing issue Jatinder: the nav timing is post processing, while bandwidth is for real time decision ... nav timing isn't a real time api Daniel: I've been writing some thoughts and will send them along Plh: should it go into XHR? Daniel: up for discussion. [adjourned]
Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2013 18:55:47 UTC