- From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 13:52:52 -0500
- To: public-web-perf <public-web-perf@w3.org>
Available at
http://www.w3.org/2013/02/13-webperf-minutes.html
13 Feb 2013
See also: [2]IRC log
[2] http://www.w3.org/2013/02/13-webperf-irc
Attendees
Present
Arvind, Philippe, Ganesh, Alois, Daniel, James, Jatinder
Chair
Jatinder
Scribe
plh
Contents
1. [3]Testing of User Timing
2. [4]Resource Timing cross origin redirect
3. [5]Navigation Timing 2
4. [6]Beacon API
5. [7]Prerender
6. [8]other specs
7. [9]Page Visibility, RAF
8. [10]Milestones
9. [11]bandwidth testing issue
__________________________________________________________
Testing of User Timing
Jatinder: I recommend we move the tests from Intel to approved
... I'll look at the resource timing tests later
... I'll move the user timing tests
Resource Timing cross origin redirect
Jatinder: I'll respond to Pan on that. Didn't close on what to
do yet. I think he has a point on per resource point
Navigation Timing 2
Jatinder: one of the goal is perceive latency and with
pre-render, the latency changes
... should we add an attribute preRenderSwitch to NV2?
... today, we get duration. would be interesting to have the
delta between loadEvent and preRenderSwitch
... it seems logical to me at least
James: sounds good to me. it ties into page visibility as well
Jatinder: we should make it clear that this is not real time
performance but rather data to understand page load performance
... I'll follow up by mail
... we'll have to be careful on how preRenderSwitch will come
off
Beacon API
Jatinder: sent mail about this regarding the relationship with
XHR
... so we don't have to reinvent everything
... seems like there is interest
... I was hoping we can continue exploring, so let's not cut it
from our list
... in a perfect world, I would love to have XHR take it on
Alois: yes, this would require some input from our side. let's
try to reuse here
... hopefully it will get into XHR
Jatinder: it seems we'll need to provide guidance to them
... we'll send them a proposal
Prerender
Arvind: I started to write it
Jatinder: I have a bunch of questions and will hold until you
come up with something
Arvind: two ways, link tag and when the browser does it (like
typing in the address bar)
... I'm focusing with the link tag
Jatinder: yes, I don't think we should define heuristic indeeed
... should we say that "user agents can use heuristics" ?
... should we say something about prerendering https?
Arvind: we waited to avoid side effect
Daniel: do we have data on side effects?
Arvind: not really, I'll follow up
Jatinder: should we leave the spec open or not?
... also a performance impact. Should we put limits?
... it seems logical to one, rather than the whole result page
Arvind: ok, I'll keep working on it
Jatinder: if you can share the documentation you have, that
would be nice
other specs
Jatinder: resource priorities, diagnostic
Page Visibility, RAF
Plh: we're on track
Milestones
Plh: are the milestones correct?
Arvind, Jatinder: yes
bandwidth testing issue
Jatinder: the nav timing is post processing, while bandwidth is
for real time decision
... nav timing isn't a real time api
Daniel: I've been writing some thoughts and will send them
along
Plh: should it go into XHR?
Daniel: up for discussion.
[adjourned]
Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2013 18:55:47 UTC