Re: Moving Page Visibility to PR: issues and tests

Re. Chrome, we are working on it. The CL should go out for review this week.


On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org> wrote:

> So, I put together the issues list for Page Visibility:
>  http://www.w3.org/2013/02/pv-cr-report.html
>
> We're good on that front.
>
> For tests, we're also good.
>
> I modified the tests to always run all of them instead of a subset if PV
> isn't supported:
>  http://www.w3.org/2013/02/pv-cr-report.html
>
> A few caveats:
> - test_minimize has a tendency to run before I have to minimize the
> window. I'll look again at the test to check the timeouts. If someone
> can check my results for that test with Opera, that would be
> appreciated.
> - I added an idlharness.js test as well. I had to add support for enum
> in idlharness.js (also now using webidl2.js). Not sure if it's valuable
> to propagate the change upstream or not.
> - chrome still has the prefix. Any chance the chrome guys could remove
> it now that PV is moving to PR?
>
> Philippe
>
>
>
>