- From: Arvind Jain <arvind@google.com>
- Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 17:30:53 -0700
- To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Cc: public-web-perf <public-web-perf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOYaDdOcL4N84pgwEdLGrwPDkz6Durbn-tNgYzcw_RaQ6kw_0A@mail.gmail.com>
Is it ok to just update the spec in a non compatible way i.e. in the new version of the spec, we say visibility is at document level (which would be not backwards compatible). Or do we need to add a new property? Arvind On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: > We at mozilla is certainly in support of this. In fact, bz has strongly > argued that this should be the case for a very long time. > > / Jonas > On Aug 24, 2013 2:11 PM, "Arvind Jain" <arvind@google.com> wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> I've seen a few requests where developers would like to query for >> visibility of their IFRAME (when the iframe is in third party context). >> >> Today, in Page Visibility, we set document.visibilityState to "hidden" or >> "visible", but it is really the visibility of the top level browsing >> context that includes the given document. This information is made >> available to third party IFRAMEs. >> >> What do folks think of making document.visibilityState the property of >> the document itself instead of the top level browsing context? That way you >> can detect conditions like when the IFRAME is below the fold and therefore >> not visible while the top level browsing context itself is visible. >> >> Thanks, >> Arvind >> >
Received on Sunday, 25 August 2013 00:31:21 UTC