- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 16:27:22 -0400
- To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- CC: Nat Duca <nduca@chromium.org>, public-web-perf <public-web-perf@w3.org>
On 4/10/13 3:49 PM, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: > Seeing that requestAnimationFrame is using the Page Visibility > definition of visibility The problem, again, is that the Page Visibility definition was only done that way because I was told it would NOT be used for things like this. The Page Visibility definition is useful for being able to deal with media playback (which is not intrinsically tied to "visibility" in the case of audio, for example, but may well be tied to "attention", which is more what Page Visibility tries to capture). > As such, no further change will be made to the specification. Let us > know if you're dissatisfied by the outcome and would like to object. I would like to object to using the Page Visibility definition of visibility for requestAnimationFrame, yes. -Boris
Received on Wednesday, 10 April 2013 20:27:53 UTC