- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 13:07:06 -0400
- To: public-web-perf@w3.org
On 5/9/12 12:58 PM, Nat Duca wrote:
> Hi folks -
>
> The current rAF spec defines FrameRequestCallback in the following way:
>
> callback FrameRequestCallback = void (DOMTimeStamp time);
>
> However, we don't define the semantic meaning of the time argument.
See section 5 step 1:
1. Let t be the result of getting the next sample time of the
top-level browsing context.
Editorial note
ISSUE-2 Getting the next sample time is currently undefined.
This time should be the same as the time that contemporaneous
native animations have been sampled at.
Note that the above definition, if adopted, would allow either of your
two options to be conformant; the key is that it match all other
animations so that the timeline is consistent.
-Boris
Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2012 17:07:36 UTC