- From: Jatinder Mann <jmann@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 16:39:48 +0000
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>, "public-web-perf@w3.org" <public-web-perf@w3.org>
> I don't actually see a need for this entire paragraph, since it's all covered in IDL already. In > fact, I'd prefer not having prose that duplicates the IDL... I'm okay with removing it. > Are there security concerns about subframes being able to extract "now" > information relative to the navigation start of the root document? Yes, I believe Sigbjorn and Tony mentioned something similar on the list. We are planning on using navigationStart as the time base origin; navigationStart is unique for every document, even same origin documents. > I'm not sure what the "MUST never be zero" requirement means in practice. If the return > value is only accurate to 0.1ms, then it seems quite possible to get it twice in a row and end >up with the same value on modern hardware, but the text seems to prohibit that behavior. > Am I missing something? Considering monotonically increasing is defined as for all x and y such that x ˜ y, one has f(x) ˜ f(y), we shouldn't restrict subsequent calls from having zero delta. I will remove that requirement. Thanks, Jatinder
Received on Thursday, 1 March 2012 16:40:57 UTC