- From: Jatinder Mann <jmann@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 02:12:16 +0000
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>, "public-web-perf@w3.org" <public-web-perf@w3.org>, "Zhiheng Wang (zhihengw@google.com)" <zhihengw@google.com>
On Saturday, June 23, 2012 10:44 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > The specification curently says (section 4.4): > > PerformanceTiming objects in the timing attribute may be sorted by > the chronological order of the corresponding browsing context. > > "the timing attribute" returns a PerformanceTiming object. There are not > such objects "in" this attribute, that I can see. So I'm not sure what's being > sorted here, nor what "chronological order of the corresponding browsing > context" means exactly. This needs to be clarified, assuming this sentence > is needed at all. > > -Boris As to my knowledge, neither IE nor Chrome have defined any iterator here. As there isn't any clear benefit of keeping this sentence, I am not opposed to removing it. Zhiheng, do you recall why we included that sentence? Thanks, Jatinder
Received on Thursday, 28 June 2012 02:13:15 UTC